Supplements
Need, evidence, dose transparency, ingredient form, contaminant testing, third-party verification, interactions, cost per useful dose.
Transparency
Product reviews and recommendation standards
Reviews should help readers make better decisions—not disguise advertising as evidence. Phase 1 launches with a rigorous framework ready for future brand-specific reviews.
Wearables
Intended use, validation, comfort, battery, exportability, privacy, subscriptions and actionability.
Apps
Clinical claims, engagement burden, data permissions, accessibility, cancellation and evidence for the exact program.
Books and courses
Author expertise, citations, balance, practical value, novelty and separation of science from opinion.
Food products
Ingredient quality, nutrition context, portion, price, claims and practical convenience.
Home tests
Analytical validity, clinical validity, false results, interpretation pathway and privacy.
Scoring model
100-point review rubric
| Category | Points |
|---|---|
| Evidence and intended use | 30 |
| Safety and transparency | 25 |
| Quality and validation | 20 |
| Usability and accessibility | 15 |
| Value and total cost | 10 |
Affiliate disclosure
Future reviews may contain affiliate links. Compensation will never change the scoring rubric, evidence label or disclosure of limitations. Sponsored placements must be clearly labeled and kept separate from editorial rankings.
Corrections
Manufacturers and readers can submit documentation or corrections. Material changes will be logged with a date and explanation.
Submit documentation